Assembling the heterogeneous elements for (digital) learning

No burden for TEQSA, yea right

The quote attributed to Lisa Paul illustrates the vast distance between her experience and that of staff within universities. The phrase “we’ll get to that after the AUQA audit” has been oft repeated at one institution I’m familiar with for at the best part of a year.

It signifies important tasks being put to the side while the entire focus of the institution is on presenting the same, appropriate story to the AUQA auditors when they arrive. It signifies how important it is to senior management on limited term contracts to get a good tick from external agencies, regardless or the reality. It signifies how the quality of teaching materials and experience suffers while the institution expends resources on printing posters and handouts, and purchasing coffee mugs to spread the “AUQA story”.

A new regulator, especially one that is expected to have some additional “bite”, is only going to make this problem worse.

People talk about “teaching to the test”, (at least some) universities are now “managing to the audit”.

Amplify’d from www.theaustralian.com.au

Asked about the burden under a new regulator, department secretary Lisa Paul said universities already had to contend with audits by the Australian Universities Quality Agency.

“There is no guarantee yet, I would have thought, that there is going to be any more burden on universities than there already has been,” she said.

Read more at www.theaustralian.com.au

 

Previous

Ideas for extending the flexibility of BIM

Next

Thesis abstract v1.0b

3 Comments

  1. David

    Couldn’t agree more – in fact this was pretty much the argument of my PhD…

    Auditing kills off innovation, particularly innovation online which is so hard for AUQA to measure…

  2. kwilco

    Rest assured that Australia has nothing on the U.S. regarding games playing. We are the champs!

    • Had wondered about the US context. I had a vague impression that it is a much more diverse system, but (and maybe because of) that external accreditation has a longer history and is seen as more important. Is that the case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

css.php